The house fly, Musca
domestica Linnaeus, is a well-known cosmopolitan pest of both
farm and home. This species is always found in association with
humans or activities of humans. It is the most common species found
on hog and poultry farms, horse stables and ranches. Not only are
house flies a nuisance, but they can also transport disease-causing
organisms. Excessive fly populations are not only an irritant to
farm workers but, when there are nearby human habitations, a public
health problem could occur.
This common fly originated on the steppes of central Asia, but
now occurs on all inhabited continents, in all climates from
tropical to temperate, and in a variety of environments ranging from
rural to urban. It is commonly associated with animal feces, but has
adapted well to feeding on garbage, so it is abundant almost
anywhere people live.
The house fly has a complete metamorphosis with distinct egg,
larva or maggot, pupal and adult stages. The house fly overwinters
in either the larval or pupal stage under manure piles or in other
protected locations. Warm summer conditions are generally optimum
for the development of the house fly, and it can complete its life
cycle in as little as seven to ten days. However, under suboptimal
conditions the life cycle may require up to two months. As many as
10 to 12 generations may occur annually in temperate regions, while
more than 20 generations may occur in subtropical and tropical
regions.
life cycle
Egg: The white egg, about 1.2 mm in length, is laid singly
but eggs are piled in small groups. Each female fly can lay up to
500 eggs in several batches of 75 to 150 eggs over a three to four
day period. The number of eggs produced is a function of female size
which, itself, is principally a result of larval nutrition. Maximum
egg production occurs at intermediate temperatures, 25 to 30°C.
Often, several flies will deposit their eggs in close proximity,
leading to large masses of larvae and pupae. Eggs must remain moist
or they will not hatch.
eggs
Larva: Early instar larvae are 3 to 9 mm long, typical
creamy whitish in color, cylindrical but tapering toward the head.
The head contains one pair of dark hooks. The posterior spiracles
are slightly raised and the spiracular openings are sinuous slits
which are completely surrounded by an oval black border. The legless
maggot emerges from the egg in warm weather within eight to 20
hours, and immediately feeds on and develop in the material in which
the egg was laid.
The larva goes through three instars and a full-grown maggot, 7
to 12 mm long, has a greasy, cream-colored appearance. High-moisture
manure favors the survival of the house fly larva. The optimal
temperature for larval development is 35 to 38°C, though larval
survival is greatest at 17 to 32°C. Larvae complete their
development in four to 13 days at optimal temperatures, but require
14 to 30 days at temperatures of 12 to 17°C.
Nutrient-rich substrates such as animal manure provide an
excellent developmental substrate. Very little manure is needed for
larval development, and sand or soil containing small amounts of
degraded manure allows for successful belowground development. When
the maggot is full-grown, it can crawl up to 50 feet to a dried,
cool place near breeding material and transform to the pupal stage.
Pupa: The pupal stage, about 8 mm long, is passed in a
pupal case formed from the last larval skin which varies in color
from yellow, red, brown, to black as the pupa ages. The shape of the
pupa is quite different from the larva, being bluntly rounded at
both ends. Pupae complete their development in two to six days at 32
to 37°C, but require 17 to 27 days at about 14°C). The emerging fly
escapes from the pupal case through the use of an alternately
swelling and shrinking sac, called the ptilinum, on the front of its
head which it uses like a pneumatic hammer to break throug the case.
pupation cycle
Adult: The house fly is 6 to 7 mm long, with the female
usually larger than the male. The female and can be distinguished
from the male by the relatively wide space between the eyes (in
males, the eyes almost touch). The head of the adult fly has
reddish-eyes and sponging mouthparts. The thorax bears four narrow
black stripes and there is a sharp upward bend in the fourth
longitudinal wing vein. The abdomen is gray or yellowish with dark
midline and irregular dark markings on the sides. The underside of
the male is yellowish.
adult
adult head
The house fly is often confused with the stable fly, Stomoxys
calcitrans (Linnaeus), and the false stable fly, Muscina
stabulans (Germar). All three are in the same family.
house and stable fly comparison (dorsal
view)
house and stable fly comparison (ventral
view)
Adults usually live 15 to 25 days, but may live up to two months.
Without food, they survive only about two to three days. Longevity
is enhanced by availability of suitable food, especially sugar.
Access to animal manure does not lengthen adult life and they live
longer at cooler temperatures. They require food before they will
copulate, and copulation is completed in as few as two minutes or as
long as 15 minutes. Oviposition commences four to 20 days after
copulation. Female flies need access to suitable food (protein) to
allow them to produce eggs, and manure alone is not adequate. The
potential reproductive capacity of flies is tremendous, but
fortunately can never be realized. Scientists have calculated that a
pair of flies beginning reproduction in April may be progenitors,
under optiminal conditions and if all were to live, of
191,010,000,000,000,000,000 flies by August.
Longevity is enhanced by availability of suitable food,
especially sugar. Access to animal manure does not lengthen adult
life and they live longer at cooler temperatures. They require food
before they will copulate, and copulation is completed in as few as
two minutes or as long as 15 minutes. Oviposition commences 4-20
days after copulation. Female flies need access to suitable food
(protein) to allow them to produce eggs, and manure alone is not
adequate.
The flies are inactive at night, with ceilings, beams and
overhead wires within buildings, trees, and shrubs, various kinds of
outdoor wires, and grasses reported as overnight resting sites. In
poultry ranches, the nighttime, outdoor aggregations of flies are
found mainly in the branches, and shrubs, whereas almost all of the
indoor populations generally aggregated in the ceiling area of
poultry houses.
According to a study conducted in Texas, USA, breeding site
suitability (in descending order), was horse manure, human
excrement, cow manure, fermenting vegetable, and kitchen waste.
However, another study found that structures containing swine,
horse, sheep, cattle, and poultry varied in fly abundance, with
swine facilities containing the most and poultry the least. Fruit
and vegetable cull piles, partially incinerated garbage, and
incompletely composted manure also are highly favored sites for
breeding.
Flies commonly develop in large numbers in poultry manure under
caged hens, and this is a serious problem requiring control.
Although this fly species does not bite, the control of Musca
domestica is vital to human health and comfort in many areas of
the world. The most important damage related with this insect is the
annoyance and the indirect damage produced by the potential
transmission of pathogens (viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and
nematodes) associated with this fly. Pathogenic organisms are picked
up by flies from garbage, sewage and other sources of filth, and
then transferred on their mouthparts, through their vomitus, feces
and contaminated external body parts to human and animal food.
Of particular concern is the movement of flies from animal or
human feces to food that will be eaten uncooked by humans. Also,
when consumed by flies, some pathogens can be harbored in the
mouthparts or alimentary canal for several days, and then be
transmitted when flies defecate or regurgitate. In situations where
plumbing is lacking, such as open latrines, serious health problems
can develop, especially if there are outdoor food markets,
hospitals, or slaughter houses nearby. Among the pathogens commonly
transmitted by house flies are Salmonella, Shigella,
Campylobacter, Escherichia, Enterococcus, Chlamydia, and many
other species that cause illness. These flies are most commonly
linked to outbreaks of diarrhea and shigellosis, but also are
implicated in transmission of food poisoning, typhoid fever,
dysentery, tuberculosis, anthrax, ophthalmia, and parasitic worms.
The threshold density for determining when to control flies
depends on the area where the control measures will be taken. In
general, at homes the threshold is very low and control actions are
taken with few flies The complaint threshold density of the house
fly at waste management sites may be 150 individuals per flypaper
per 30 minutes.
House flies are monitored with baited traps, sticky ribbons, or
spot cards on livestock facilities. Spot cards are 3-inch by 5-inch
white index cards attached to fly resting surface. A minimum of five
cards should be placed in each animal facility and left in place for
seven days. A count of 100 or more fecal or vomit spots per card per
week indicates a high level of fly activity and a need for control.
Tolerance of flies depends greatly on circumstances. In sensitive
environments such as food preparation and packing facilities,
restaurants, and hospitals, even small numbers of flies cannot be
tolerated. In the context of livestock or poultry production,
however, some flies are inevitable. Serious problems occur when
cities or suburban development occur near poultry production
facilities, as residents usually will not tolerate the large numbers
of flies emanating from such facilities.
The more commonly used control measures for house flies are
sanitation, use of traps, and insecticides, but in some instances
integrated fly control has been implemented. The use of biological
control in fly management is still at a relatively early stage.
Sanitation or cultural control. Good sanitation is the
basic step in any fly management program. Food and materials on
which the flies can lay eggs must be removed, destroyed as a
breeding medium, or isolated from the egg-laying adult. Since the
house fly can complete its life cycle in as little as seven days,
removal of wet manure at least twice a week is necessary to break
the breeding cycle. Wet straw should not be allowed to pile up in or
near buildings. Since straw is one of the best fly breeding
materials, it is not recommended as bedding. Spilled feed should not
be allowed to accumulate but should be cleaned up two times a week.
Ordinarily, fly control from 1 to 2 km around a municipality
prevents prevents house fly infestations.
Killing adult flies may reduce the infestation, but elimination
of breeding areas is necessary for good management. Garbage cans and
dumpsters should have tight-fitting lids and be cleaned regularly.
Dry garbage and trash should be placed in plastic garbage bags and
sealed up. All garbage receptacles should be located as far from
building entrances as possible.
For control at waste disposal sites, refuse should be deposited
onto the same area as inorganic wastes to deteriorate the capacity
of breeding resources, or the disposed refuse should be covered with
soil or other inorganic wastes (15 cm thickness) on every weekend or
every other weekend.
Around homes and businesses, screening or covering of windows,
doors or air doors, and trash containers proves useful in denying
access of flies to breeding sites. Packaging household trash in
plastic bags, and burying trash under at least 15 cm of soil and in
sanitary landfills also helps to eliminate breeding. Trash cans and
dumpsters should have tight-fitting lids; failing this, slow release
fumigant insecticide dispensers are sometimes installed on the
inside of the lids to reduce fly survival.
In agricultural areas, manure can be scattered over fields so
that it quickly dries and becomes unsuitable for egg and larval
survival. Composting of manure can be effective if the compost is
properly maintained, including regular turning. Manure can also be
liquefied and stored in lagoons anaerobically, though at some point
the solids need to be separated.
Traps. Fly traps may be useful in some fly control
programs if enough traps are used, if they are placed correctly, and
if they are used both indoors and outdoors. House flies are
attracted to white surfaces and to baits that give off odors.
Indoors, ultraviolet light traps collect the flies inside an
inverted cone or kill them with an electrocuting grid. One trap
should be placed for every 30 feet of wall inside buildings, but not
placed over or within five feet of food preparation areas.
Recommended placement areas outdoors include near building
entrances, in alleyways, beneath trees, and around animal sleeping
areas and manure piles. Openings to buildings should be tightly
screened with standard window screen, thereby denying entrance to
flies.
Traps can be baited with molasses, sugar, fruit or meat, and
often are used in combination with a device that captures the
attracted flies. The sex pheromone (Z)-9-tricosene also functions as
an aggregation pheromone, and is called muscalure. Muscalure is
formulated with sugar as a commercially-available fly bait for local
population suppression, as well as an enhancement for population
monitoring.
Ultraviolet light traps can be used to assess population levels,
but also serve as a non-chemical control technique that can be used
indoors in both agricultural and non-agricultural areas. They
normally function by electrocuting flies that enter the trap, though
those used in restaurants typically have a sticky panel. Flies do
not orient to traps from a great distance, so several are normally
needed for them to be effective. Placement should include within 4
to 8 m of entryways, and within 1.5 m of the floor, to take
advantage of fly flight behavior. They should be operated
continuously, although they are most effective when the room lights
are off.
Biological control. With the increasing incidence of
insecticide resistant house fly populations, rising costs of
insecticides and a growing public concern about actual or potential
problems associated with insecticides, interest in alternative house
fly control strategies has increased.
Natural biological suppression of the house fly results primarily
from the actions of certain chalcidoid wasps (Hymenoptera:
Pteromalidae), of which many species have been associated with house
fly around the world. Among the more important are
Muscidifurax and Sphalangia spp. Ichneumonids and
other parasitoids, as well as some predatory insects (especially
histerids [Coleoptera: Histeridae] and staphylinids [Coleoptera:
Staphylinidae]), also contribute to fly mortality, but under optimal
fly breeding conditions the house fly quickly builds to high
numbers. The more important in poultry facilities are the wasps
M. raptor and S. cameroni. Leaving a layer of old
manure in the pits when manure is removed might enhance or stabilize
the suppression of the house flies densities by parasitoids and
predators.
parasitized pupae
M. raptor
Augmentative biological control (Periodic release of parasitoids
during winter and spring, and following manure removal) using
insectary-reared parasitoids has been quite successful in some
dairies, feedlots and poultry house situations. The species most
often released for biological suppression in North America are
M. raptor, M. raptorellus, S. endius, and
S. nigroaenea. These different species function better
under different conditions, some performing better under cooler or
warmer conditions, others parasitizing flies near the surface or
deeper in the pupation medium.
In North Carolina, tests showed that when house fly populations
occur near the surface on the drier periphery of the manure, the
conditions favor parasitism by M. raptor. When the flies
pupate at greater depths the conditions favor S. cameroni. In
North Florida, releases conducted with S. endius showed that
they could successfully parasitize pupae, both above and below the
soil surface.
The larvae of the black dump fly, Hydrotaea
(=Ophyra) aenescens, is also regaining popularity
as a biological control agent for controlling house flies on poultry
farms without the use of pesticides. The adult black dump fly is
similiar in appearance to the adult house fly (Hogsette and Jacobs
2003).
Integrated fly control. Integrated fly control programs
for caged-poultry houses are based on the following strategy:
- selective applications of insecticides against the adult,
- start insecticide control measures early in the spring before
flies appear and repeat as frequently as needed through the warm
months, and
- the manure is left undisturbed throughout the warm months when
fly breeding may occur. The manure should be removed once very
early in the spring before any flies appear.
Chemical control. When the house fly is a mayor pest in
commercial egg production facilities, the control of this insect is
by the application of adulticides, or larvicides to directly or
indirectly suppress adult densities. Residual wall sprays can be
applied where the flies congregate. Resistance to permethrin
develops more rapidly in fly populations from farms on a continuous
permethrin regime than in farms in which permethrin and diclorvos
have been alternated.
Outdoors, the control of flies includes the use of boric acid in
the bottom of dumpsters, treatment of vertical walls adjacent to
dumpsters and other breeding sites with microencapsulated or
wettable powder formulation, and the use of fly baits near adult
feeding sources.
Manure can also be treated with an insecticide, though this
method is highly discouraged as it interferes with biological
control of flies, often resulting in a rebound of the fly
population. More commonly, insecticides (especially insect growth
regulators) can be fed to livestock, and residual insecticide in the
manure inhibits fly breeding. In animal facilities, insecticides are
often applied to the favored resting places of adults, or bait
stations established to poison adults with either solid or liquid
formulations. Continuous exposure of flies to insecticides has led
to development of insecticide resistance to many insecticides.
Indoors, the control of flies includes automatic misters, fly
paper, electrocuting and baited traps that can be used in milk rooms
and other areas of low fly numbers.
For specific chemical and monitoring recommendations, see the
Florida Insect Management Guide at:
Insect Management Guides for filth-breeding
flies
Using sticky cards to monitor fly populations in
poultry houses
- Amano K. 1985. Breeding of the house fly, Musca
domestica, (Diptera; Muscidae) in fresh dung of cattle fed on
pasture grass. Applied Entomological Zoology 20: 143-150.
- Anderson JR, Poorbaugh JH. 1964. Observations on the ethology
and ecology of various Diptera associated with Northern California
poultry ranches. Journal of Medical Entomology 1: 131-147.
- Axtell RC. 1970. Integrated fly-control program for
caged-poultry houses. Journal of Economic Entomology 63: 400-405.
- Barnard DR, Geden CJ. 1993. Influence of larval density and
temperature in poultry manure on development of the house fly
(Diptera: Muscidae). Environmental Entomology 22: 971-977.
- Bishoff FC, Dove WE, Parman DC. 1915. Notes on certain points
of economic importance in the biology of the house fly. Journal of
Economic Entomology 8: 54-71.
- Dame D, Fasulo TR. (2003). Flies. Public Health Pesticide
Applicator Training Manual. http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/fasulo/vector/
(11 August 2006).
- Fasulo TR. (2002). Bloodsucking Insects and Filth-breeding
Flies. Bug Tutorials. University of
Florida/IFAS. CD-ROM. SW 156.
- Fasulo TR, Kern W, Koehler PG, Short DE. (2005). Pests In and Around the Home. Version
2.0. UF/IFAS CD-ROM. SW 126.
- Hedges SA. (ed.). 2004. The Mallis Handbook of Pest Control.
9th ed. GIE Media, Cleveland. 1396 pp.
- Hewitt CG. 1914. The House-Fly, its Structure, Habits,
Development, Relation to Disease Control. University Press,
Cambridge England.
- Hogsette JA, Jacobs RD, Miller RW. 1993. The sticky card:
device for studying the distribution of adult house fly (Diptera:
Muscidae) populations in closed poultry houses. Journal of
Economic Entomology 86: 540-454.
- Hogsette JA, Jacobs RD. (2003). The black dump fly: a larval
predator of house flies. EDIS. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/PS021 (22 March
2007).
- Hogsette JA. 1996. Development of house flies (Diptera:
Muscidae) in sand containing various amounts of manure solids and
moisture. Journal of Economic Entomology 89: 940-945.
- Howard LO, Bishopp FC. 1925. The house fly and how to suppress
it. USDA Farmers' Bulletin 1408. 18 pp.
- Imai C. 1985. A New Method to Control Houseflies, Musca
domestica, at waste disposal sites. Research in Population
Ecology 27: 111-123.
- Krafsur ES, Black IV WC, Church CJ, Barnes DA. 1985. Age
structure and reproductive biology of a natural house fly
(Diptera: Muscidae) population. Environmental Entomology 14:
159-164.
- Lord FT, Boston MD. 1904. Flies and tuberculosis. Boston
Medical and Surgical Journal 151: 651-654.
- Lysyk TJ. 1991. Effects of temperature, food, and sucrose
feeding on longevity of the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae).
Environmental Entomology 20: 1176-1180.
- Lynsk TJ. 1993. Adult resting and larval development sites of
stable flies and house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairies in
Alberta. Journal of Economic Entomology 86: 1746-1753.
- Kaufman PE, Scott JG, Rutz DA. 2001. Monitoring insecticide
resistance in house flies from New York dairies. Pest Management
Science 57: 514-521.
- Kaufman PE, Rutz DA. 2002. Susceptibility of house flies
(Diptera: Muscidae) exposed to five commercial insecticides on
painted plywood. Pest Management Science 58: 174-178.
- Kaufman PE, Rutz DA, Frisch S. 2005. Large sticky traps for
capturing house flies, Musca domestica, and stable flies,
Stomoxys calcitrans, in dairy calf greenhouse facilities.
Journal of Dairy Science 88: 176-181.
- MacDonald RS, Surgeoner GA, Solomon KR. 1983. Development of
resistance to permethrin and dichlorvos by the house fly (Diptera:
Muscidae) following continuous and alternating insecticide use on
four farms. Canadian Entomologist 115: 1555-1561.
- Merchant ME, Flanders RV, Williams RE. 1987. Seasonal
abundance and parasitism of house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae in
enclosed, shallow-pit poultry houses in Indiana. Environmental
Entomology 16: 716-721.
- Morgan PB, Weidhaas DE, Patterson RS. 1981. Programmed
releases of Spalangia endius and Muscidifurax raptor
(Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) against estimated populations of
Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Medical
Entomology 18: 158-166.
- Ostrolenk M, Welch H. 1942. The common house fly (Musca
domestica) as a source of pollution in food establishments.
Food Research 7: 192-200.
- Ross EH. 1913 The Reduction of Domestic Flies. J.B. Lippincott
Co. London 103 pp.
- Rutz DA, Axtell RC. 1981. House fly (Musca: Muscidae) control
in broiler-breeder poultry houses by pupal parasites (Hymenoptera:
Pteromalidae): indigenous parasite species and releases of
Muscidifurax raptor. Environmental Entomology 10: 343-345.
- Rutz DA, Kaufman PE, Waldron JK. 2001. An Integrated Approach
to Managing Fly Pests in Dairy Calf Greenhouses. 2000 NYS
Livestock and Field Crops Project Reports Relating to IPM. NYS IPM
Pub. #320. pp. 80-91.
- Savage EP, Scoof HF. 1955. The species composition of fly
population at several types of problem sites in urban areas.
Annals of the Entomological Society of America 48: 251-257.
- Seymour RC, Campbell JB. 1993. Predators and parasitoids of
house flies and stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in cattle
confinements in west central Nebraska. Environmental Entomology
22: 212-219.
- Scott JG, Alefantis TG, Kaufman PE, Rutz DA. 000. Insecticide
resistance in house flies from caged-layer poultry facilities.
Pest Management Science 56: 1-7.
- Watson DW, Kaufman PE, Rutz DA, Glenister CS. 2001. Impact of
the darkling beetle, Alphitobius diaperinus Panzer on the
establishment of the predaceous beetle, Carcinops pumilio
Erichson for Musca domestica control in caged-layer
poultry houses. Biological Control 20: 8-15.
- West LS. 1951. The Housefly, its Natural History, Medical
Importance, and Control. Comstock Publ Co. Ithaca, N.Y. 584
pp.